Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender" Results 321 - 340 of 1,464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
Item: Protestors arrested in Portland who appear before federal magistrates for bond are being ordered, as a condition of release, not to attend any public protests:“Defendant may not attend any other protests, rallies, assemblies or public gathering in the state of Oregon,” states one “Order Setting Conditions of Release”So much for the sanctity and respect we have for our federal courts. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Canberra Times reports that Australia’s top legal officers are expected to agree to overhaul defamation laws to protect public interest journalism and control “spiralling” payouts. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am by Grant Sullivan
Sullivan is an assistant solicitor general with the Colorado Attorney General’s office, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of nine states in support of respondents in Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
  the claim was struck out and judgment was entered for the defendant. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Attorney’s office and replaced her with Timothy Shea, who abruptly changed the office’s position on the prosecutions of Trump allies Stone and Flynn.The appeals court should have taken those incidents and others like them into account when it rolled out its “presumption of regularity. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Minutes earlier, however, Attorney General William Barr had ordered federal law enforcement officials and military police under federal control to push peaceful protesters from the streets around Lafayette Square—which they did using flashbangs, smoke bombs, pepper balls, rubber bullets and mounted police officers. [read post]
It is important to also note that last week U.S Attorney General William Barr announced a parallel federal civil rights investigation into the death of Mr. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
Defenders of Wildlife (1992)).Like members of the public, members of Congress, too, have a “public interest in proper administration of the laws,” Lujan, but that interest isn’t any different from the “generalized interest of all citizens in constitutional governance”--an interest that’s insufficient to support Article III standing when the Executive is alleged to have acted unlawfully, or ultra vires. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
(For a discussion of how intelligence collection priorities are set through the NIPF and other processes, see pages 5-6 of this publication from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.) [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
PL [Peter Lurie] is with Public Citizen’s Health Research Group. [read post]