Search for: "Windsor v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 12:50 am
Rev. ___ (2014): Depending on one’s religious and political proclivities, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
The same provision of DOMA, of course, was later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) issued guidance addressing the treatment of same-sex spouses under the HIPAA Privacy Rule in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The IPKat’s friends at C5 have put together a big conference on Trade Mark Litigation, on 29 and 30 January 2015 at the Royal Windsor Hotel, Brussels. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm
” The court traces Puerto Rico path to becoming a “possession” of the United States, observing that the underlying definition of marriage did not change. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
About Windsor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
The decision was a clear break with the near-unanimous results of federal trial and appeals courts in the wake of the Justices’ ruling last year in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:47 pm
Nelson in 1972, a view that has been rejected by every other federal court since United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Likewise there is an almost obsessive interest in patent litigation in the United States, where the subject lies somewhere between a cottage industry and an art form, with ever-shifting guidance concerning injunctions, damages, patent eligibility and the interrelationship of patent suits with the sale price of patents singly or in bundles. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Retroactive Great Case Status for United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
” The guidance stems from a Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:38 pm
Second, it adds to the already long and impressive string of victories by same-sex marriage advocates in numerous court decisions since the Supreme Court issued United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:16 am
This ongoing, thoughtful process contributed not only to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
" What struck me initially about United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:45 pm
Hinderaker speculates that some or all of the four conservatives justices who dissented in United States v. [read post]
