Search for: "johnson"
Results 321 - 340
of 33,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Johnson & Johnson moved for summary judgment based on its expert testimony that the company’s talcum powder and talc did not contain asbestos. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 12:06 am
This is not a trivial concern, but given the fairly bright line of the Johnson Amendment, the amount of monitoring seems minor. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:24 pm
., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, had "agreed to pay $360 million to resolve claims that it illegally used a [section 501(c)(3) charitable] foundation as a... [read post]
A Landmark Court Ruling in China: Resale Price Maintenance as Examined in the Johnson & Johnson Case
4 Nov 2013, 4:32 am
Chunfai (CF) Lui (Stephenson Harwood) explores A Landmark Court Ruling in China: Resale Price Maintenance as Examined in the Johnson & Johnson Case. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:44 am
Louis, Missouri, a jury found Johnson & Johnson liable in a civil suit concerning many of their products containing talcum powder this past Monday. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 8:50 am
For the past several years, Johnson & Johnson has been locked in numerous legal battles with consumers who claim that the talcum powder sold by the company has led to numerous cases of ovarian or cervical cancer. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Louis City Circuit Court judge refused to grant Johnson & Johnson’s motions following the July 13, 2018 jury verdict of $4.7 billion against Johnson & Johnson for injuries suffered by 22 women. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 6:08 am
” Johnson & Johnson “said in a statement Friday that there had been no new developments. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:47 am
” To learn more about this ongoing court battle, read “Johnson & Johnson told to pay $4.7 billion in baby powder case. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:47 am
” To learn more about this ongoing court battle, read “Johnson & Johnson told to pay $4.7 billion in baby powder case. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:15 am
The defendants are refuting the plaintiffs’ claims that McNeil and Johnson & Johnson failed to warn about the risk of liver injury. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:15 am
The defendants are refuting the plaintiffs’ claims that McNeil and Johnson & Johnson failed to warn about the risk of liver injury. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:15 am
The defendants are refuting the plaintiffs’ claims that McNeil and Johnson & Johnson failed to warn about the risk of liver injury. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
Alison Frankel finds it problematic that a derivative shareholder suit against the Johnson & Johnson board was thrown out before it could incur millions of dollars of discovery costs and an extortionate settlement. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 9:44 am
The anticoagulant is Bayer’s top selling drug and is Johnson & Johnson’s third highest selling drug. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:59 am
Johnson & Johnson recalled Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen products after some samples tested positive for low levels of benzene. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:03 pm
Johnson will join representatives from ... [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:13 am
House of Representatives approved an appropriations bill with a rider that prohibits the IRS from enforcing the Johnson... [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:11 am
It was the second time Johnson & Johnson has been found responsible for similar damages. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:32 am
The New York Times reports Johnson & Johnson’s orthopedic unit, DePuy Orthopaedics, announced “that it was phasing out production of all-metal replacement hips, a move reflecting an industrywide trend to abandon the once widely used implants because of high early failure rates. [read post]
