Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 9,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2015, 1:40 pm
The fact that you were on the phone with her for 35 minutes? [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:43 am
As to the legal issue of anticipation:A patent is invalid for anticipation under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:39 am
In addition, the presumption of validity under 35 U.S.C. 282 applies when Section 101 patent ineligibility is raised as an invalidity challenge. [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:27 am
” “After the grant of drug approval for Gleevec, on July 3, 2001, the appellant made a Patent Term Extension Application for the Zimmermann patent (US Patent No. 5,521,184) under 35 USC § 156(g)(1)(B), for extending the term of the patent for the time taken in the regulatory review for Gleevec. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
Here are the earlier entries: 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm
M&K is ordered to reimburse costs for, and reasonably related to, Hager’s prescribed medical marijuana.1. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
., here: WTF does that mean?! [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
§ 271(e)(1). [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:23 am
Moreover, the Order does not impact the city of Denver’s new minimum wage law, H.B. 1210, which raised the minimum wage to $12.85 effective Jan. 1, 2020. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:59 pm
"JaneAnne Murray adds: How does this ruling square with United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
§ 271(e)(1). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:42 am
Repeals the law establishing county extradition funds on July 1, 2013. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
§ 271(e)(1). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:41 am
At trial, the jury returned a verdict of 0.45 cents per chip — which added up to $35 million. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm
Sharia does not require a majority vote. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:35 am
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
That case, which stems from a district court’s refusal to grant summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds to a police officer who shot and killed a fleeing driver, asks two questions: (1) whether, when viewing the facts from his perspective, the officer acted reasonably under the Fourth Amendment; and (2) whether the law clearly established that this use of potentially deadly force was unlawful. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:57 am
35(1) EUAPR). [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:38 am
35 U.S.C. 101 SME Analysis Analysis of 35 U.S.C. 101 for subject matter eligibility is a two-step process outlined in §2106 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, or MPEP.[9] I will provide an abbreviated analysis, ending before step 2B, for illustrative purposes. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
So what does this all have to do with intellectual property? [read post]
