Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 3381 - 3400 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2019, 11:49 am by Jeffrey Mirro
  The trial court agreed that some of the tracts represented the husbands separate property. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
R and his wife were eventually evicted from their home following the sale of the property at public auction on 22/10/03, despite R’s attempts to have the sale postponed. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
R and his wife were eventually evicted from their home following the sale of the property at public auction on 22/10/03, despite R’s attempts to have the sale postponed. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:01 am by Hillary A. Frommer
Faced with competing petitions for letters of administration, the court was asked to find as a matter of law, that the cross-petitioner was the decedent’s wife and sole distributee of the decedent’s estate. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 1:56 pm by Gregory Forman
 At trial the family court awarded Wife 20% of Husbands personal injury claim and Husband 20% of Wifes consortium claim. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:35 pm
In Schaefer, the defendant officers fired their weapons at a husband who was holding his wife hostage, and accidentally fatally shot the wife. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:59 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Given these finding, it seems odd that the wifes request for counsel fees was denied. [read post]
4 May 2022, 2:20 pm by Gregory Forman
”).Although we note section 63-3-530(A)(38) provides another vehicle for the family court to award attorney’s fees, Husband raised no challenge to the family court’s application of this statute on appeal. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:57 pm by Eliana Baer
The Husband further agrees to execute such qualifying domestic relations order [QDRO] as may be necessary to direct the organization administering the pension to make the Wifes one-third share of each pension payment directly to the Wife. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:30 am by Liisa Speaker
In a case out of Oakland County, Elkins v Benner, Nos 331701, 332664, 333114, the plaintiff Elkins argued the alter-ego rule to make the defendant Nancy Benner, spouse, responsible for her ex-husband/disbarred attorneys’ failure to pay the agreed upon referral fee. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:02 am by Burton A. Padove
The businesses were held by an S corporation, of which husband was CEO and wife was vice president. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 6:26 am by Grant
Wife also appealed the trial court's narrow interpretation of Husband's earnings. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:54 am by Jimmy Verner
The remaining two issues - whether the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to award spousal support to the husband, and whether any evidence supported the trial court's award of appellate attorney's fees to the wife - were not affected by the acceptance-of-benefits doctrine because they did not concern the division of the community estate. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:45 am by Mark Graber
  Blackstone’s Commentaries declare, “by marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law; that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm by Liisa Speaker
The defendant maintained the lower courts erred by ignoring the Legislature’s mandates, as well as the Court of Appeals decision in Reed v Reed, 265 Mich App 131 (2005). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:27 pm by Sandy T. Fox
A husband and wife cannot create subject matter jurisdiction by waiver, acquiescence or agreement. [read post]