Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 6,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2013, 9:16 am
Tudor v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:51 am
GUION v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Frazier v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 4:05 am
In In re Marriage of Sarah Peterson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Finchum v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:36 pm
By Daniel RichardsonWelch v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:54 am
Moore also signed deed conveying the property from himself to himself and his wife as tenants by the entirety, as his plan was for both of them to hold title jointly as husband and wife. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:54 am
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
This resulted in an award of 99% of the marital estate to Wife according to Husband’s calculations, or 96.5% using Wife’s numbers. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm
Lester, 85 F.3d 1409 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that wife’s one-half interest in portion of community property was not liable to criminal forfeiture imposed on her husband). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:31 am
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
The recently decided Appellate Division matter of Scianni v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:29 am
” It was only upon her husband’s new application that Ms. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:27 am
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
” However, as a result of DOMA, there is one significant exception, codified in 1996: “[f]or federal tax purposes, a marriage means only a legal union between a man and a woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” means a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
M.G. and D.D. were also husband and wife. . . . [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:25 am
Henshaw v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:18 am
Farnsworth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:14 pm
At the hearing on the wife’s petition, the husband disclosed that he had received a $300,000 lump-sum workers’ compensation settlement the year before. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Cioffi-Petrakis, the wife contended that her husband had reneged on his oral promise to tear up their prenuptial agreement once she had children made shortly before the pre-nuptial agreements’s execution (the parties now have two sons and a daughter). [read post]
