Search for: "John Doe C"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 5,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
The District Court held that Kirtsaeng could not assert this defense because the doctrine does not apply to goods manufactured abroad. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:33 pm
Cooper c/o Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
The revelation 11 days ago that the executive branch does not claim the authority to kill an American non-combatant – something that was not, is not, and should never be an issue – is big news, and trumpeted as a major victory for congressional oversight. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:33 pm
John McGowan, the defendant was a licensed to carry firearms. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Copyright (and patent!) [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:11 pm
“[A]s it is now clear that the Agency does have an interest in drone strikes, it beggars belief that it does not also have documents relating to the subject,” the Court concluded. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:03 pm
Here's what the order does, and the significance of its terms. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm
P. 15(c). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
By Glen C. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:13 am
A new and relevant paper from Ohlin Kevin John Heller develops an interesting and vigorous challenge to my analysis of Article 35 of the 1977 Protocol to the Geneva Conventions (in which Jens David Ohlin essentially concurs in part III of his essay). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 11:03 am
The New York Times editorial page has still not corrected its error of the other day, when it promoted John Brennan to National Security Adviser. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:23 am
C. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael C. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
John Doe Resists: Ingenuity 13 LLC begins to issue subpoenas seeking to reveal the identity of John Doe. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 10:03 am
John Does 1 - 13," Patrick Collins, Inc. of Canoga Park, California ("Patrick Collins"), alleged direct and contributory infringement by 13 then-unidentified individuals including John Doe No. 7. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Entertainment & Media Law Signal Manson v John Doe – Damages for Anonymous Online DefamationThe recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Manson v John Doe (2013 ONSC 628) offers an opportunity to reflect on both the procedures and outcomes of pursuing court actions for anonymous online defamation. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am
(File Nos. 1997-1519/A, 1997-1519/C, 1997-1519/D), 2010-11057. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am
(File Nos. 1997-1519/A, 1997-1519/C, 1997-1519/D), 2010-11057. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:06 am
And so the Board affirmed the failure-to-function refusals.Read comments and post your comment here.Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2012)As part of that seminar, Professor Broekman organizes a wonderful Roundtable on semiotics and the law, featuring distinguished faculty and Penn State's law students. [read post]
