Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 3381 - 3400 of 6,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Laws passed by Congress as well as orders from the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
* Pharma and biotech patents: a law unto themselves -- and a litigation conference to match? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
A Portugese judge has concluded the couple were “emotionally hurt” by the USA Real Housewives of Miami star Joanna Krupa has filed a defamation suit against her co-star Brandi Glanville. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am by Ben
 Sound recordings weren’t brought under the protection of federal copyright law until 1972 so are protected by state laws and some services, notably SiriusXM, haven’t been paying performance royalties to artists to play these older works prompting claims from both artists (with Flo & Eddie from the Turtles leading the charge), record labels and collection society SoundExchange. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thus, the Court of Appeals properly reviewed the District Court’s conclusions of law de novo. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:24 am by assoulineberlowe
In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro reports on Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Plumley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 am by Eric Goldman
Two of them are “Discount Mobility” and “Discount Mobility USA. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:58 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer, in fact, allowed employees to wear union insignia on the company cap by accessorizing it in an appropriate manner (World Color (USA) Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
The other opinion came in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:06 pm
 This finding was upheld on appeal as reported by Jeremy here.Well, today the Supreme Court of the USA has weighed in on the same matter in the case of Teva v Sandoz. [read post]