Search for: "MICHAEL GIVENS"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 14,776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
These include its terms, its underlying ambitions, ideologies, and the feasibility of its gasp, given the constraints within which its authors are necessarily made to work. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 2:57 pm
Academics are not always as gracious about this as they ought to be.3) It aims to be a bit "Graetzean," which I mean as a compliment to Michael Graetz. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Andrew Yang’s Speaking Fees, Including from JPMorgan, Raise Campaign Finance Questions: Experts ABC News – Armando Garcia | Published: 8/30/2019 Months after announcing his bid for the presidency as a Democrat, Andrew Yang was paid for a number of speaking engagements. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 7:07 am
In addition to the quality of the proposals, special consideration will be given to gender balance and the representation of professionals, associations and social partners in the different panels. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As my fellow Verdict columnist Professor Michael Dorf explained in his most recent column, the U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
And publication of false information is generally protected by the First Amendment, unless it falls into one of the defined exceptions.[3] We cannot, legally, require the same duty of candor for discourse outside of the formal legal environment, including the conduct of political campaigns, or for professional journalism.[4] There is a cognizable government interest in such a restriction on speech, given the volume and impact of misinformation spread through information… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Given the difficulty of amending the Constitution, it will not likely be abolished any time soon.Accordingly, reformers have been seeking to circumvent the Electoral College without a constitutional amendment, based on an idea originally proposed by law professors including my fellow Verdict columnist Dean Vikram Amar. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
This is Michael H. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 3:29 pm
Michael Horowitz would probably not describe his findings that way. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:01 am
Given the fundamental importance of critical reading to the work of law students (and lawyers), surely it is worth sacrificing some of professors’ valuable class time to strengthen students’ proficiency in this skill. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Given that the Roberts Court tends to zealously guard the freedom of speech, why does it insulate police from lawsuits for a large category of retaliatory arrests? [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 6:36 am
The post The Law Bytes Podcast, Season One in Review: The Telecom and Broadcast Policy Episodes appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Inventive Software, LLC, Opposition No. 91235063 (August 21, 2019) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
Even Mueller apparently requested guidance from the Department of Justice about his testimony, and former officials such as Sally Yates and Jim Comey—both fired by Trump—have also asked for guidance on privilege or given the pre [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
” Given the circuit split that this case creates, this issue would seem ripe for review at the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Cherokee Nation Sending First-Ever Delegate to Congress Newsweek – K Thor Jensen | Published: 8/20/2019 The Cherokee Nation is appointing its first delegate to Congress. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:00 pm
The court would never say so, given that it claimed it was only handling a claim for nominal damages. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeterminate does not mean wide open.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
Congress passed the Michael Shepard and James Byrd Jr. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
After Anat Rosenberg's article “Amongst the Most Desirable Reading”: Advertising and the Fetters of the Newspaper Press in Britain, c. 1848–1914, Law and History Review 37:3 (August 2019) is given over to the symposium, Originalism and Legal History: Rethinking the Special Relationship. [read post]
