Search for: "STATE v. GREEN" Results 3381 - 3400 of 6,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2007, 11:32 am
Here's a criminal case with an interesting parallel and lessons for us.The First District Court of Appeal in Green v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am by Kevin
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:18 pm by Simon Gibbs
, the decision of Costs Judge Master Campbell in Schneider v Door2door PTS Ltd [2011] EWHC 90210 (Costs) is worth reviewing. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:23 am
" In the recent state Supreme Court race, Superior Court Judges Debra Todd and Maureen Lally-Green cited the rule in declining to state their views on such issues as abortion or gun control. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by Kelly
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am by Melina Padron
Burnley Training College Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2928 (Admin) (24 August 2011) November 9, 2011 Admin Court: Refusal of licence for Burnley college under Home Secretary’s policy to prevent abuse by overseas students was unlawful. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]