Search for: "Samsung"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 6,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2012, 3:02 pm
Samsung, Goophone, Intellectual Property, iPhone 5, LTE, Patents, Samsung, Technology, Trademarks, Vicious Infighting [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:50 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is OSRAM GmbH of Germany and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia, LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea, LG Innotek Co., Ltd. of South Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. of San… [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:46 am
Note Apple asked ND CA in San Jose on 1 July 2011 to issue a preliminary injunction that would prevent Samsung from infringing three Apple design patents, and one utility patent.If granted, the preliminary injunction would apply to Samsung products including the Galaxy S 4G smartphone and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer.See Apple seeks injunction in Samsung patent case [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:16 pm
Essentially, Best Buy was claiming that Samsung should be a party to the lawsuit because Samsung was likely at fault for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:45 am
The Order further states that while there are other respondents besides Samsung, the settlement agreement resolves this Investigation in its entirety. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:45 pm
According to the Order, Respondents Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:40 pm
” According to Order No. 17, OSRAM sought an order compelling Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
The complaint asserts that the Samsung chips at issue include some of Samsung’s most recent generations of flash memory chips, namely Samsung’s 35, 42, 51, and 65 nanometer NAND Flash Memory Technology Node devices. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:38 am
Samsung Electronics (Fed. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Case No. 3:13-CV-3599-N (the “Samsung Case”) In the Samsung Case, the Court focused on certain prior litigation when analyzing the relevant history of the prior representations: In particular, Samsung retained Powers and Cherensky to represent it in Samsung Elecs. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
At Tensegrity, they continued to represent Samsung. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
At Tensegrity, they continued to represent Samsung. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
At Tensegrity, they continued to represent Samsung. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:24 pm
Our Samsung started emitting these strange crackling noises and the picture would jump. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:07 am
” Previously restricted areas on mobile devices include the Secure Folder (Samsung), Private Space (Huawei), KeyChain (iOS), Email (Android and iOS), third-party application data, system and application logs, and deleted content, which are now accessible through MEDAL-enabled extractions. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
The Apple, Google, Samsung, HTC patent litigation parade never stops, does it? [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:16 pm
The court has unanimously overturned Justice Bennett, opening the way for Samsung to get its products into stores just in time for Christmas (for those who have not yet done their shopping). [read post]
