Search for: "State v. Foster "
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,036
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2010, 2:49 pm
The case is Perdue v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:25 pm
These lawyers beat the hell out of the State of Georgia in challenging the way it ran its public foster homes. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:21 pm
The preceding chapters focus in detail on emergency preparedness, foster care, psychological impact, oral history, juvenile justice, and education. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm
Astrue v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:59 am
” The Court’s ruling came in a case in which the challenging lawyers brought about a wide-ranging reform of the state of Georgia’s foster-care system, which was plagued by heart-wrenching stories of abuse of children, leading to escapes and attempted suicides. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:29 am
Last week’s 8th District decision in State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:08 am
In Perdue v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
In Fahrenholz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
Last Friday Judge Christopher Piazza, a state circuit judge in Arkansas, struck down Act I, the Arkansas ballot initiative that banned adoption by or foster placement in a household where the applicant for parental rights is cohabiting with a sexual partner outside of marriage. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:21 am
DYFS v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Citing Jegley v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
John Ward in a Marshall case that alleges that what is waitin' at the station in Tenaha was not exactly a gal ...In Morrow, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
(Sabbah v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
The Supreme Court held that “one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:46 pm
See Craig v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm
Axel previously prosecuted white-collar crime cases in the Central District of California and handled United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
Circuit's March 2, 2010 decision in Teva Pharms USA, Inc. v. [read post]
