Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 19,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on… [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:17 am
Addressing the penalty imposed on Petitioner, the Appellate Division, noted that the Petitioner's record established that Petitioner consistently received "strong evaluations for his work performance" and that Petitioner had "expressed remorse and that he was not proud of his conduct. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:44 pm
Moderated by David Carson (IFPI), the final copyright session of the 22nd Fordham IP Conference was devoted to the forthcoming decision of the US Supreme Court in ABC v Aereo [an entire session on this? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the Court of Appeals held that an arbitration award may be vacated by the court if it finds that arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power.Finding that in Petitioner's case the arbitrator's determination was supported by evidence in the record, that nothing in the record indicates… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:59 am
This is one of them.The case is PMB v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:16 pm
This was demonstrated in the recent case Dye v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:37 am
Here, with McCormick v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Supreme Court properly concluded that the arbitrator's determination did not clearly violate a strong public policy, was not totally or completely irrational, and did not manifestly exceed a specific, enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power.The court explained that although the payment of a public employee's legal fees "would constitute an impermissible donation from the public purse in instances where there is no prior legal… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:14 am
Ambrose v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Boston Scientific Corp. and Asthmatx, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
Supreme Court granted the college’s cross motion to confirm the arbitration award, which decision was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that an arbitrator's award will not be vacated "unless it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational, or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on his power. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
& Long Term Care Assocs., LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:33 pm
In the complaint, BLUE SPHERE, INC. et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:11 am
+V&ActID=2104&ChapterID=60&SeqStart=6800000&SeqEnd=7200000Read More [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division observed that "A court may vacate an arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his [or her] powers within the meaning of CPLR 7511(b)(1)(iii) only where the arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 10:23 am
The history of the jurisprudence surrounding women's health issues -- or rather, the history of state legislation in the years following Casey v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:29 pm
However, Kennedy uses the word dignity (or indignity) a total of 10 times in his fairly short opinion – signaling the importance of an interest that he used to invalidate a Texas law criminalizing non-coital sex in Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court circumvented this impasse when it adopted a strong unitary interpretation of Article II in Trump v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:34 am
North Bay Regional Health Centre v Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 139, 2018 CanLII 6645 (ON LA) [read post]
