Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 6,435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the case back to Judge Brown. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:03 am
Because the district court chose to dismiss the employee’s action, the Ninth Circuit determined that it had jurisdiction to hear this appeal. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am
This was the first federal appeals court decision to interpret the scope of the Supreme Court’s decision a year ago in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:15 am
On appeal to the Ninth Circuit, the trial court’s order was affirmed. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
The Court’s selection of these cases, quite irrelevant to its discussion, appears to have come from the Solicitor General’s amicus brief in Matrixx.[2] Although cited for an irrelevant proposition, the Supreme Court’s selection of the Best’s case was puzzling because the Sixth Circuit’s discussion of the issue is particularly muddled. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. ** Accepting the advice of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
The Justices have long had a seemingly contentious relationship with the Ninth Circuit, which covers most of the western United States and Hawaii and Alaska. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 8:03 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:01 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, concluded that 300 drivers who were retained … Continue reading → [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
United States, 13-983. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but in 1999 Wilson’s replacement, Governor Gray Davis, withdrew the appeal and sent the legal dispute to mediation. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:17 am
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed this portion of the District Court’s ruling, barring POM’s Lanham Act claim. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Medtronic Inc., 704 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2013), the wrongly decided Ninth Circuit opinion allowing the plaintiff to allege state law failure-to-warn claims based on the purported failure to report adverse events to the FDA. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort.The Virginia v Black case held that a Virginia statute that… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
This was both unfortunate, and odd, since the United States Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit had previously held just the opposite.. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am
Nonetheless, the court concluded that the district court did not commit a reversible error where the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
A few weeks ago, I reported on six cases in which the Solicitor General has recently filed briefs expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
