Search for: "A. G."
Results 3401 - 3420
of 65,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 2:02 pm
§ § 922(g)(3) and 922(g)(5).HELD:(1) Testimony by government agent that Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency database contained no record that defendant had lawfully entered United States was properly admissible under public records exception to hearsay rule at Rule 803(10) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:31 pm
G. (2023). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:02 am
Roberts, Jr. and Justices Stephen G. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:28 am
More than thirty years ago, this misnaming was pointed out in the journal Science:From The "Greenhouse Effect", Robert G. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:05 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:21 am
Professor Alan Scott Rau, Mark G. and Judy G. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:57 am
Willis and Nakku Chung (University of Florida - Fredric G. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:53 am
Arnold, Judge.Representing Cubba: Ronald G. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
Programme des États Généraux de l’Aide Juridictionnelle : 9H : Accueil 9H30 : Interventions M. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 2: Interpretation of G 2/21Interpretation of G 2/21: Inventive step may be supported solely by post-published data (T 0116/18)G 2/21 does not permit armchair inventing (T 0258/21)Clarity on the interpretation of G2/21 from the referring Board (T 0116/18)Crystallising the interpretation of G 2/21 (T 1989/19)Plausibility in other technical fieldsA common misconception is that G… [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:06 pm
Mr G refused. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:54 am
The exclusion from patentability under Article 53(c) EPC can be avoided by disclaiming the embodiment, it being understood that in order to be patentable the claim including the disclaimer must fulfil all the requirements of the EPC and, where applicable, the requirements for a dlsclaimer to be allowable as defined in decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal.2c. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:36 am
Effective July 22, 2010, Section 939G of the Dodd-Frank Act provides that Securities Act Rule 436(g) will have no force or effect, which effectively removes the ``expert’’ exemption for credit ratings included in a registration statement, As a result, disclosure of a rating in a registration statement requires inclusion of the consent by the rating agency to be named as an expert. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:51 am
ESTATE OF GARY G. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 8:54 pm
Anna G. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:47 am
G. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 4:00 pm
David G. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
• Harlan Yu & David G. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 11:07 pm
William G. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:02 am
Today’s post comes from guest author Ryan Benharris from Deborah G. [read post]
