Search for: "B. N. S." Results 3401 - 3420 of 16,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 10:25 am by Shea Denning
The defendant moved for a mistrial and to disqualify the witness under Rule of Evidence 601(b) and strike his testimony. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:10 am by Maureen Harbourt and Lauren Rucinski
The list is available at: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/list-n-disinfectants-use-against-sars-cov-2. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:15 am by A. Sasha Mandy
Pour leur part, les bénéficiaires des licences accordées dans ce cadre s’engagent à une mise en marché large et à faible prix de leurs produits pour en faciliter l’accès. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
At Fox News, Bill Mears and Ronn Blitzer report that “[i]n 2013, the Supreme Court said this requirement violates the First Amendment if applied to U.S. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:00 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Requerir que el personal que desarrolle algún síntoma después de su regreso, tales como fiebre, tos, dificultad para respirar y otros no podrá presentarse a trabajar bajo ningún concepto. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:23 am by Alka Bahal
Procedure for List B Documents extended by an Issuing Authority If the employee’s List B identity document expired on or after March 1, 2020, and the issuing authority has extended the document expiration date due to COVID-19, the document is acceptable as a List B document for Form I-9 (not as a receipt) during the extension timeframe specified by the issuing authority. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:44 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
” (p. 9)Pautas de precedenciaNuestra legislación establece las pautas para dar la prioridad de un determinado país en los siguientes casos en los que se reclame a la misma persona: 1. [read post]
Such a disapproval vote must be filed with Connecticut’s secretary of state within 72 hours of the governor’s announcement to take effect. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
Here, the government regulates a person's property, but insists there is no taking. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]