Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 3401 - 3420 of 9,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by SHG
The ACLU did its job by serving its client within the bounds of the law. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 8:16 am by Ken White
The Rule reflects a clear judgment that prosecutors (at least state prosecutors — federal prosecutors have sometimes claimed that they are not bound by state ethical rules that contradict federal policy) can't withhold exculpatory evidence based on their subjective belief that it's not credible or not useful to the defense or wouldn't make a difference. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:49 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  There are however, limits of the amount of punitive damages, when they are appropriate as held in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:57 am by Jan von Hein
It involves the actual pursuit of an economic activity through a fixed establishment in another Member State for an indefinite period (CJEU in Factortame and Others, C-221/89, para. 20 and Commission v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Legal Beagle
Questions are now being asked why SBC claim ignorance of any of the events surrounding NERR which  also controlled New Earth Solutions Group.The full Isle of Man court judgement is here: IOM FSA v THE ECO RESOURCES FUND / 14 July 2017 / CIVIL - CHANCERY PROCEDUREA feature on the report is available here; Fresh calls for "waste fiasco" inquiryFull updates on the Scottish Borders Council fiasco and other news from the Scottish Borders can be found… [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Joy Waltemath
” Also, parties are generally bound to the actions of their attorneys, even when the actions are errors are omissions. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:22 pm by skelly
Since the Bellefonte decision (Bellefonte Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The court’s jurisdiction The defendants were Twitter entities incorporated in Ireland and the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See, e:g., Laub v Faessel, 297 A.D.2d 28, 31 (1st Dep’t 2002) (stating that for breach of fiduciary, “plaintiff must establish that the alleged misrepresentations or other misconduct were the direct and proximate cause of the losses claim”); Pokoik v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Negotiating disciplinary procedures for City of Schenectady police officers held a prohibited subject of collective bargainingCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]