Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
The style of the case is, Ford Bacon & Davis, L.L.C. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:36 am
It’s a bread-and-butter legal precept meant to prevent people who live in California from having to answer to lawsuits in Texas, for example. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
DE Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:32 am
Super-Sized: The Washington Post examines the closely watched sex discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
For the Constitution in 2020 conference on The Future of Equality.Douglas NeJaimePopular accounts and media commentary on the federal suits challenging the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California’s Proposition 8 focus largely on the inevitable march toward marriage equality.Implicit in such accounts is a claim about the impact of favorable court decisions on the LGBT rights agenda.After a district court victory in the Massachusetts DOMA case and the more recent announcement by… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:48 am
In Yumul v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
France, Jamie E., A proposed solar access law for the state of Texas. 89 Tex. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
(“Gyrodata”) had pending lawsuits in Texas and California. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:19 am
[There’s an actual California court case on that. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:19 am
[There’s an actual California court case on that. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:09 am
Janet Freilich, a 2L from Harvard, kicked off the discussion and presented a nuisance framework that judges could use to determine when to issue injunctions, supplementing the four-part test endorsed in eBay v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
Laws identical to the new Illinois one exist in New York (where litigation over it is ongoing), North Carolina, and Rhode Island, and have been introduced this year in Arizona, California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, Tennessee, Texas, and Vermont. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm
We first asked our editors whether recoupment was permitted in their states: California (Sara Thorpe) California has definitive and strong law on an insurer's right to recoup both defense costs (Buss v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Assemblyman V. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Texas in 2009. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:41 am
Settle, 260 U.S. 166 (1922) and Texas v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:38 pm
Texas, the Supreme Court struck down laws criminalizing consensual sexual acts between same-sex adults, and in Goodridge v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
I'll also include my name here (Ted Brooks) as your California connection. [read post]
