Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 30,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 8:08 am
If the yardstick is whatever is not mentioned in the constitution is fair game for a state to outlaw, then all sorts of activities from sports to exercise to foods can be banned. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:05 am
” Becker v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:26 am
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:33 pm
Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:01 pm
They invoke AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:34 pm
It couldn't deny affected states all or most federal health care funding (that is precluded by NFIB v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:24 am
In Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:32 am
The case is Daleiden v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:47 am
Legal principles The Guidelines review application of the key principles under GDPR: (i) fair processing under Article 5(1)(a), (ii) data minimisation under Article 5(1)(c), (iii) accountability of the data controller under Article 5(2), (iv) transparency under Article 12 and (v) data protection by design under Article 25. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
” In a draft strategic plan distributed by FTC leadership in October 2021, the agency described its mission as promoting “fair competition” for the “benefit of the public. [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:36 pm
Last month, the United States House of Representatives passed the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act, or the “FAIR Act. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:43 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 9:32 am
BAAQMD states its new climate change thresholds follow an approach endorsed by the Supreme Court in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:28 am
Young v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 10:58 am
.)'s opinion in Houser v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:56 pm
The case is Quality Plus Feeds, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
