Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 3401 - 3420 of 5,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm by Bexis
  Riegel requires device-specific PMA requirements to establish preemption, and thus also requires a violation of device-specific PMA requirements to avoid preemption through the parallel violation loophole:[P]ursuant to the premarket approval process, medical device manufacturers must adhere to device-specific requirements. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:19 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
McDougal’s objection that ‘if A, then B’ does not equal ‘if, and only if, A, then B’ cannot be upheld if one looks at the Charter context. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:57 pm by Simon Gibbs
Justice Minister Lord McNally has proposed an amendment that reads: “Clause 43 Page 30, line 30, leave out from “not” to end of line 32 and insert “prevent a costs order including provision in relation to a success fee payable by a person (“P”) under a conditional fee agreement entered into before the day on which that subsection comes into force (“the commencement day”) if - (a) the agreement was entered into specifically for the purposes… [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 10:38 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 Written submissions reasonably determined to qualify for confidentiality may be delivered or mailed to:Cultural Heritage Center (ECA/P/C)SA-5, Fifth FloorDepartment of StateWashington, DC 20522-0505Comments submitted to CPAC must address one, some, or all of the four determinations outlined by the CPIA. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:56 am by WSLL
  You should use thiscitation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by admin
 28, a defendant claiming fair comment must satisfy the following test: (a) the comment must be on a matter of public interest; (b) the comment must be based on fact; (c) the comment, though it can include inferences of fact, must be recognisable as comment; (d) the comment must satisfy the following objective test: could any person honestly express that opinion on the proved facts? [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:37 am by Employment Services
P. 42(B).In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court resolved a conflict among the appellate districts in Ohio. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:31 am by Ross
On hourly matters, you’re probably still eating a ton of time that you just can’t bill for all the subsidization of your own inefficiency. [read post]