Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 3401 - 3420 of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2007, 10:59 am
Reference: ERISA § 206(d)(3)(B); IRC § 414(p)(1); Advisory Opinion 90-46A; see Boggs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:35 am by Matthew Flinn
CA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2278 (10 September 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a a control order which required the “controlee” to relocate and live at an address in Ipswich, away from his family in Crawley, was unlawful. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"**The Court of Appeals decision notes that "New York's public policy strongly disfavors the receipt of state pensions by persons also receiving state salaries, citing §150 of the Civil Service Law as establishing New York State's general public policy against the simultaneous receipt of a state pension and a state salary. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
Resolving disputes pursuant to the arbitration clause set out in the City Manger's employment contract held not against public policyMatter of City of Newburgh v McGrane, 2009 NY Slip Op 51463(U), Supreme Court, Orange County, Judge Robert J. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate, heard 21 – 22 March 2011. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Section 4663(c) provides, in relevant part: (c) In order for a physician’s report to be considered complete on the issue of permanent disability, the report must include an apportionment determination. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:50 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
There are minor exceptions (cellar treatment pursuant to 27 CFR 4.22(c) and blending which does not result in an alteration of the wine’s class and type under 27 CFR 4.22(b)). [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:55 am by Anthony Gaughan
The filing also invokes the political question doctrine, raises a Rule 12(b)(3) venue issue, and even works in a 12(b)(6) reference to the strict pleading standard articulated in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]