Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 3401 - 3420 of 7,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The CAFC determines that offering a service, without rendering the service, is insufficient to support trademark registration
3 Mar 2015, 5:15 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 1127; Aycock Eng’g, Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Will the Common Good Guys Come to the Shootout in SEC v. Jarkesy? And Why It Matters
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/
Tuesday Talk*: Who Pays When Cops Destroy?
26 Nov 2024, 4:47 am by SHG
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
Simple Justice - http://blog.simplejustice.us
Wrongful foreclosure claim in Texas
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 See Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. [read post]
Texas Causes of Action Blawg - http://causeofactionelements.blogspot.com/
Ninth Circuit: No Taking for Forced Attorney Low Bono* Labor
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
State of Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), United States v. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
Four Qualcomm patent suits against Apple dismissed by Munich court, four others in zombie mode
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States, SK hynix is represented by Sidley Austin against Netlist. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
Differential Etiology and Other Courtroom Magic
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
” Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
[Eugene Volokh] And One More on Expert Witnesses in Libel Lawsuits
9 May 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Fla.) in Grayson v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A Scathing Denial of Summary Judgment in a Legal Malpractice Case
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They cite Jocer Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Here's a MOUNTAIN of willful-infringement evidence the Oracle v. Google jury won't see in trial phase one
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
Even After Koontz, The U.S. District Court Recognizes Existing Ninth Circuit and California Supreme Court Precedent Holding That Generally-Applied Legislative Exactions Are Not Governed By The Strict Takings Scrutiny Of Nollan/Dolan
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Inc., 544 U.S. 528, 546-47, 125 S. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
James Joyce, Ulysses and the Meaning of Obscenity
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Jennifer Davis
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
In Custodia Legis - http://blogs.loc.gov/law
Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The TM part of this might need revisiting in light of Abitron; the court earlier held that use of a mark in the US wasn’t required to bring Lanham Act claims, but subsequently Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Federal Court Rules Trade Secret Misappropriation Sufficiently Alleged Based on Improper Acquisition, Even in Absence of Use or Disclosure
8 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm by Erik B. von Zeipel
”  Systems 4, Inc. v. [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Gig Workers’ Fight For Justice: A View From Comparative Law
29 May 2019, 6:59 am by Melanie Fontes
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
Harvard Law and Policy Review - http://harvardlpr.com/
Fun Trade-marks
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am by Sander Gelsing
’s rights in the famous mark BARBIE were not enough to for our Supreme Court to find a likelihood of confusion with a restaurant operating under the name Barbie’s (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22). [read post]
Now, Why Didn't I Think of That? - http://www.gelsing.ca/blog
Never too late: if you missed the IPKat last week
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
And 10,000 more are coming…* CJEU on taser, ahm, tacit prorogation of jurisdictionMark pens of Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others (Case C-175/15), a decision where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed the issue of whether Article 24 of Brussels I Regulation applies in cases where one party is domiciled in a non-EU Member State. * Two Book Reviews: European Law Design and The Changing European PatentDavid reviews… [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Sam’s Club Loses Motion to Dismiss David Yurman Trademark Lawsuit Based on First Sale Doctrine Defense
10 Apr 2015, 4:26 pm
” Mary Kay, Inc. v. [read post]
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney - http://www.vegastrademarkattorney.com/
Check-Out Time at the Hotel California?
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Egenera prevails at CAFC on "judicial estoppel" question.
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Egenera, Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/