Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 3421 - 3440 of 5,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2013, 7:55 pm by Cookson Beecher
” That’s how some organic farmers and advocates are describing the government’s “eleventh-hour” decision on Jan. 1 to extend the 2008 farm bill for 9 months instead of enacting a new 2012 farm bill. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 41.67(c)(1)(vi).ANDWe do not agree with Frame Media. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:44 am by Bexis
  The plaintiff claimed 37-year exposure to asbestos-containing products while working for the Illinois Central Railroad. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 1:27 pm by Larry Catá Backer
 (Pix from Peter Drysdale, China and India as strategic partners, East Asia Forum, July 16, 2012 )Privatization, the Role of Enterprises and the Implementation of Social and Economic Rights: A Comparison of Rights-Based and Administrative Approaches in India and China.Larry Catá Backer (白 轲)[1]Abstract: From the middle of the last century, socio-economic rights have been bound up within the ideology of the state within national legal orders and through the… [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 8:44 am by Larry Catá Backer
The findings are based on an online survey of 6,224 consumers across Brazil, China, India, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States conducted in September and October 2012.Well, what does this mean? [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 2:11 pm by Mark Theodore
  As explained below, at this stage, the employer need not bargain to agreement or impasse, if it does so afterward. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:10 pm
The second registration is probably the one which Luke alludes to in Acts 5:37, in speaking of the rebel Judas the Galilean. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board entered new grounds of rejection under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board entered new grounds of rejection under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:00 am by David Cosgrove
” (Opinion at 37).Judge Russell proceeded on to address Questar's multi-layered contention that the Panel violated FAA Section 10(a)(3) in that it allegedly refused to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Again, the case at issue does not give rise to any discussion on insufficient payment, but on the interpretation of the opponents intent to pay. [read post]