Search for: "German v. German"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am
In 2000, Schmitz sold an 80 percent stake in Data Protect to the German conglomerate TÜV Rheinland, which bought the company for its “in-depth network expertise.” Schmitz held the remaining stake through his new holding company, Kimvestor. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Injunction against, inter alia, installing time bomb on computers , RELIABLE v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
Call ERIC (European Research Infrastructure Consortium) (IP finance) Germany German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht): Annual report for 2008 (Class 46) German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) finds SCHLÜSEL lacks distinctiveness for locksmith and security devices and services (Schlüssel means ‘key’) (Class 46) India Confederation of Indian Industry’s conference on combating counterfeiting and… [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/80gI93fnmZ -> Bell appeals CRTC ruling forcing company to sell fibre internet access to small ISPs https://t.co/bPpIts12vV -> ECHR finds interception of mobile communications in Russia violated privacy rights ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
So what would be a strict liability case in the U.S. appears to be neither negligence nor foreseeable under the German equivalent law.There were at least two cultural presumptions, also different in Germany from the U.S. that may reinforce this. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Evidence that the Maritime Commission had warned Bethlehem Steel about the hazards of asbestosis, and to maintain a threshold limit value of 5 million particles per cubic foot, was not particularly germane or helpful in avoiding mesothelioma among employees. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
First Quality Baby Products (Patently-O) Supreme Court denies sham patent reexamination dispute: Lockwood v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Otten (EPLAW) Non-infringement case: Safeway v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:01 am
ACLU v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
On 24 May 2023, Nicklin J made orders in the cases of Harcombe v Associated Newspaper Limited & anr QB-2020-000799 and Kendrick v Associated Newspaper Limited & anr QB-2020-00080. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm
Susan V. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Germany v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
The CJEU’s decision in Colloseum v Levi Strauss (Case C-12/12) provides a good example for such a case. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
In 1990, the same mark was also registered with the German Patent and Trade Mark Office for goods in Class 12 (land vehicles, aircraft and water vehicles and parts thereof, motors and engines for land vehicles, and car components).Ferrari sold a sports car model under the designation ‘Testarossa’ between 1984 and 1991 and the follow-up models 512 TR and F512 M until 1996. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
Additionally, the Commission can disagree with these authorities on the issue of a new application evoking an earlier geographical indication.Marcel Pemsel examined the German Supreme Court’s decision on an advertisement featuring a “climate neutral” theme. [read post]
