Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one application for leave to appeal and held the case of People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 4:10 am
The court held that the 4th Circuit's decision in Bostic v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
Oregon and held that the Sixth Amendment, applied to the states by the Fourteenth, requires unanimous jury verdicts in criminal cases. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
In Ramirez-Barker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Next term, the justices will consider Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Hood v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:20 am
I have twice blogged about court orders coming out of the United States District of Arizona Court’s Barten v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 5:48 am
The plaintiffs in this lawsuit, Amal Gaza, et al v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
: Gonzales v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
It is posted on the Internet at http://www.jcope.ny.gov/advice/ethc/98-12.htmIn Pagan v Commissioner of Labor, 53 AD3d 964, the Appellate Division addressed the disqualification of an applicant for unemployment insurance benefits following his termination for accepting a designation to run as a candidate for the State Assembly, ruling that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:49 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
"The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him [or her]' " (People v Brown, 13 NY3d 332, 338). [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm
SEB (2011), when the Court held that induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
