Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 4,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Where a spouse or child has been intentionally or unintentionally omitted under a will, the spouse or child (including adopted children or those born out-of-wedlock) are entitled to claim recapture rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Where a spouse or child has been intentionally or unintentionally omitted under a will, the spouse or child (including adopted children or those born out-of-wedlock) are entitled to claim recapture rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Where a spouse or child has been intentionally or unintentionally omitted under a will, the spouse or child (including adopted children or those born out-of-wedlock) are entitled to claim recapture rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Where a spouse or child has been intentionally or unintentionally omitted under a will, the spouse or child (including adopted children or those born out-of-wedlock) are entitled to claim recapture rights. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
I recommend it to anyone who is interested in the theory and history of American constitutional law. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
Although it is correct in law to say that the 26 week statutory provisions brought in by C&FA 2014 do not apply specifically to placement applications, it is wrong in reality to say that 26 weeks doesn’t apply to placement proceedings. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
(2) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the third degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and serious bodily injury results and is a crime of the fourth degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and bodily injury results [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
Similarly, exacerbates tension on First Amendment interests b/c we have a merchandising claim at work—Court’s intuition that he should win does real damage to Rogersby finding the use artistically relevant, but also finding that b/c we’re in the same (merchandising) market, it might be explicitly misleading even though the defendant isn’t doing anything explicitly misleading.Porous markets: Excelled Sheepskin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The inexorable introduction of more professional senior "C-suite" executives. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:19 am
These are matters of public interest about which discussions are still ongoing. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:20 am
The consequences of recognition can be modified or terminated if the Court is not satisfied that the interests of interested parties are adequately protected. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
§ 206(c), 80 Stat. 836. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
C. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:47 am
Child = under 18. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Jill Marshall, Strasbourg Observers: Cultural, Linguistic and Religious Identity and Care: recent developments in the case law: in the case of a child placed in care, “What is in the child’s best interests will not always include maintenance of biological ties, including cultural, religious and linguistic heritage from one’s biological parents”. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
See also The Federalist No. 51, p. 324 (C. [read post]
4 May 2021, 9:33 am
" … In August 2019, the New York Legislature passed the Child Victims Act, which temporarily revived the limitations period for civil claims of child sexual abuse under New York law. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
" … In August 2019, the New York Legislature passed the Child Victims Act, which temporarily revived the limitations period for civil claims of child sexual abuse under New York law. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
App. 304(c)(6)(A). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
Citizen child with him. [read post]
