Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 5,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2013, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Caymus Vineyards v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
” Under Descamps, the district court should be barred from looking beyond the elements of a simple assault statute to find that the conviction factually constituted a domestic violence misdemeanor (although the relationship can be established at trial beyond a reasonable doubt as described in Hayes). [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The order came to light only because Edward Snowden disclosed it. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:49 am
After my post defending aspects of the Court's opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:36 am
Starbucks Corporation, No. 10–4912–cv, and Winans et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
In Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
F.T.C. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
But where the plaintiffs claimed only “the inferences drawn from [the] data” were “wrong,” and that different methodology (including other “variables”) should have been used, the First Amendment barred turning such quibbles into litigation. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 12:50 pm
In the U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
United States for the American Bar Association. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:04 pm
That happens, but there’s a very strong bar to disturbing final adoption decrees. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
United States, 12-6355 (concerning application of the ever-popular modified categorical approach for determining career offender status), in light of the June 20 decision in Descamps v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:32 am
” State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Just as Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
