Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 11,299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2008, 10:22 am
The Court held that software copied outside the United States from a master disk shipped from the United States was not itself a component shipped from the United States within the meaning of Section 271 (f). [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:00 am
It's that time again... time to check in on the week's news in Suits by Suits: The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its opinion in Velazquez-Perez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Bayer, in which Section 43(a) was read to provide a cause of action to a plaintiff whose pleaded trademark had never been used in the United States). [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
Ulrich, United States V Skrmetti—Testing the Transition to Politicized Regulation of Medicine, (JAMA. 2025;333(10):839–840).S. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
This issue is becoming increasingly important in light of the growing tendency of claimants to bring GDPR claims alongside or in place of more traditional media publication claims. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:54 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
In Huckaba v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am
Wooster v Queen City Landing, LLC 2017 WL 1822611 (NYAD 4 Dept. 5/5/017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:17 pm
§ 2241(e)(2), refers solely to the executive branch, in light of this Court’s precedent stating that the plain statutory meaning of the term “United States” is “the sovereign composed of the three branches. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 4:36 am
Treatment of Marriages of Same-Sex Couples for Retirement Plan PurposesThe IRS has issued Notice 2014-19, which provides guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat the marriages of same-sex couples following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
In Central Coast Forest Assoc. v. [read post]
