Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 5,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
Further, Anthony Thornton QC J has ‘certified that this judgment may be cited and referred to in other cases or situations. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
The opinion is In re Usher, __ N.E.2d __, 2013 WL 2145636 (Indiana Supreme Court 2013), and it involves conduct by Arthur J. [read post]
21 May 2013, 4:45 am
Still further, after a federal court judge decided that the Bristol-Myers patent on the Baraclude hepatitis B treatment was invalid, some analysts are saying the ruling may prompt greater scrutiny of so-called composition of matter... [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:20 pm
DATATRAK International, Inc., 2-12-cv-04748 (NJD May 13, 2013, Order) (Martini, J.). [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Julio J., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
In keeping with the déjà vu theme of today’s post, we’ll cap off with a morsel of hold news: Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
(b) obtaining from each exchange institution. . . [read post]
12 May 2013, 7:47 am
Acuity Specialty Products: Advances in General Causation Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation,” PDF 3 Wake Forest J. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:42 am
See BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(1)(b), (c), and (h). [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Most of the case law cited by the appellant (T 128/87, T 14/89, J 13/90) is also discussed in G 2/97. [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:38 am
Standard Instruction 3.6(j) explains entrapment to the jury, as follows: The defense of entrapment has been raised. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
J. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:23 pm
In Microsoft's understanding, supported by a transcript, the court actually put all discovery unrelated to FRAND rate-setting on hold last spring.Exhibit B and C contain disclosures of witnesses by Microsoft.Exhibit D is an excerpt from a transcript of a March 14 conference call.Exhibits E-H are documents from the parties' correspondence regarding discovery requests and depositions. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:18 pm
The majority states the applicable law correctly in general terms, but under Rule 404(b), the nub of the matter lies in specific applications. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
On July 16, 2012, the Honorable Sterling Johnson referred the matter to a Magistrate to hold an evidentiary hearing and issue a Report and Recommendation. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am
§ 741.30(6)(b). [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:17 am
b. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:53 am
The mother retained Peter J. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:13 am
*See, e.g., J. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 602 provides that "[a] witness may not testify to matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter." [read post]
