Search for: "Matthews v. Matthews" Results 3421 - 3440 of 5,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2014, 9:31 am by Shahram Miri
Then in 2011, she amended her trust and allocated a larger share of the trust to one daughter, Kristi, and included a "Christian Dispute Resolution" clause to resolve disputes:"The Trustor and Co-Trustees [(Frances and Kristi)] are Christians and believe that the Bible commands them to make every effort to live at peace and to resolve disputes with each other in private or within the Christian church (see Matthew 18:15-20; 1 Corinthians 6:1-8). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Hawke, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit Attorney Matthew Kluger was sentenced to 12 years in prison, the longest term ever imposed in an insider-trading case, for stealing corporate merger tips from four law firms over 17 years. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 2:29 pm by Matthew Reisig
appeared first on New Jersey Criminal Defense Attorney - Matthew Reisig. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, e.g., Matthews Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:07 am
For example, it is possible that due process also gives rise to “substantive” due process, as well as to the evaluation of positive-law processes currently undertaken under Matthew v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:02 pm
By Matthew Hinks JMBM has prevailed in the Court of Appeal on behalf of its client in a well-publicized and hotly-contested development project in the City of Los Angeles. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Matthew Jackson, of O’Connell & Aronowitz, P.C., represented Mr. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:24 am
Now here's a case name from the past: Arsenal Football Club v Matthew Reed. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:23 am by SHG
Addressing the “short shrift” given by the majority to the due process rights denied the Kaleys under the Matthews v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm
by Matthew Hinks Spot zoning - the practice of singling out a parcel of property for either more or less restrictive zoning regulations - does not always constitute an impermissible abuse of discretion according to a new opinion from the California Court of Appeal in Foothill Communities Coalition v. [read post]