Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 3421 - 3440 of 15,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Particularly at para 45 the CJEU held that “the Member States must, when exercising their powers in the sphere of nationality, have due regard to European Union law. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As McClain describes, this back and forth was clearly on display in Loving v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
 According to Roche, "Power corrupts, and the prospect of losing power corrupts absolutely. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
People talk of Chevron deference as though it were binary (deference or no deference), but in practice it is not so monolithic. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:13 am by Matthew Segal
Supreme Court still wields enormous, and often harmful, power over the country. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Because if we think about 10 years ago v. today there’s been extraordinary progress. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm by Ilya Somin
People who pay little attention to the Court are less likely to develop deep anger against its rulings, and demand drastic action to curb its power. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
These images spoke of a people being suffocated by a text instead of mastering it. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Supreme Court could use its power to define meaning in a few ways – it could challenge and subvert the way people understand teams and constitutional issues, offering, for example, liberal defenses of religious freedom or conservative perspectives on LGBT rights (as we saw in the Bostock v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
As the Seventh Circuit stated in Rossetto, "[a] union's power to negotiate with management derives from the fact that the union is the exclusive bargaining representative of a group of people. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:21 am by gmlevine
  It describes those who prey on the prestige and drawing power of a complainant’s rights for commercial gain. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The White House issued a veto threat in response to the For the People Act, citing separation of powers, federalism, and First Amendment concerns about the election reform provisions of the bill. [read post]