Search for: "Richard Ames" Results 3421 - 3440 of 5,586
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  (I am sure that at #81 I would would have been called, because my one of my high school friends, whose number was #84, was drafted after dropping/flunking out of Virginia Tech the year before.) [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In view of the ongoing discussion about the case, I am very pleased to be able to publish here as a guest post an article analyzing and commenting on the Second Circuit’s decision written by Richard Bortnick and Micah J. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
As a dedicated law student, I am curious what your thoughts are about the list. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
As a dedicated law student, I am curious what your thoughts are about the list. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:29 pm by Mike Scarcella
For Judge Richard Leon of Washington federal district court, there's no shortage of trial work on his docket. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:48 am by Howard Wasserman
I am off to SEALS tomorrow morning, unfortunately sans famiy (we need to plan our summers better). [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 6:54 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
Richard Keep in mind this is one case in a very messed up part of the Canadian legal system. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm by George M. Wallace
  [Update 7/23/11 0740 PDT]: The Court has issued an order granting the motion (discussed here) of Richard Borzouye to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm by George M. Wallace
  [Update 7/23/11 0740 PDT]: The Court has issued an order granting the motion (discussed here) of Richard Borzouye to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm by George M. Wallace
  [Update 7/23/11 0740 PDT]: The Court has issued an order granting the motion (discussed here) of Richard Borzouye to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:44 pm by Danielle Citron
Richard Pierce reviewed the book in the George Washington Law Review, and he writes that this “excellent book is compulsory reading for anyone who is interested in the performance of regulatory agencies. [read post]