Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 3421 - 3440
of 6,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
ROBERTS v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
Lexis 1688, at *25-26 n.8 (citing Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:19 am
OLIVER, d/b/a CRAZY TONY’S RESTAURANT v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
Harkonen’s crime? [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
The Court of Appeals held first that, whereas a purchase or sale of a security is necessary for entitlement to sue on the implied right of action recognized under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, the cause of action expressly provided by RICO imposes no such requirement limiting respondent’s standing. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:17 am
The question is what sort of s/c and in what sum. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:17 am
The question is what sort of s/c and in what sum. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
(Poet, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:19 am
Under Vail and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 7:55 am
The Second Circuit’s holding in Police & Fire Retirement Sys. of City of Detroit v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:43 am
If the tolling rule is judicial, then its application is barred by the Supreme Court’s decision in Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Subsection (f) of section 15325 allows a CEQA exemption for “acquisition, sale, or other transfer to preserve open space or lands for park purposes. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
If the tolling rule is judicial, then its application is barred by the Supreme Court’s decision in Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Leslie, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:55 am
C, § 2.5). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
These proposed “investor protection” amendments are intended to enhance the SEC’s ability to evaluate market changes, the nature of advertising used by issuers, the steps taken by the issuer to verify that all investors were accredited and the intended use of the proceeds of the sale. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 8:30 am
Also decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union yesterday was a 67-paragraph ruling in Case C‑521/11, Amazon.com International Sales Inc., Amazon EU Sàrl, Amazon.de GmbH, Amazon.com GmbH, in liquidation, Amazon Logistik GmbH v Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
The case in question is Case C‑657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology BV v Bert Peelaers, Visys NV, a ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) which was published yesterday on a request for a preliminary ruling made by the Belgian Hof van Cassatie in December 2011 [Merpel notes that, even inclusive of the time taken to ask the Advocate General for an Opinion, and possibly even to read it, the CJEU dealt with this reference in… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
