Search for: "State, in Interest of Jr" Results 3421 - 3440 of 5,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 8:50 pm by Daniel D. Blinka
Callahan, Jr., spoke of the numerous Daubert challenges he has confronted over the years. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The reason for this seems intuitive: any legislative interest in maintaining or predicting the wishes of the electorate vanishes when the electorate has a chance to express its wishes itself.Even if state law constrains only gubernatorial interim appointments, and not the state electorate at special elections, there are difficult (indeed seemingly insurmountable) constitutional hurdles standing in the way of constraints imposed by the state legislative. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Despite state victories, federal action has been elusive. [read post]
7 May 2011, 2:44 am by SHG
It's Jerry Dale Watkins.The description is well-written, interesting and detailed, but for the absence of one word: warrant. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
They have a lot of freedom to do that because one in six hospitals in the United States is Catholic. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm by Bill Marler
  The law firm has brought Hepatitis A lawsuits against such companies as Costco, Subway, McDonald’s, Red Robin, Chipotle, Quiznos, Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Dismantling Unjust Interest Rates for Debt Collection Judgments March 30, 2022 | Karuna Patel, Fordham Law School States should follow New York’s lead in lowering how much interest must be paid on unpaid debt judgments. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
In 1912, Senator Jonathan Bourne, Jr. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, which reawakened Commerce Clause review of federal legislation yet hardly ushered in a new era of robust judicial review; and District of Columbia v. [read post]