Search for: "State v. Billings"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 19,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2018, 7:26 am
In Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:44 am
” This is in conflict with Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:11 am
Summary of AB 1076 First, AB 1076 codifies existing caselaw, Edwards v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
Evans to United State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:37 am
Supreme Court to Address Causation Requirements in Asbestos Case -Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
The House Courts of Justice committee passed a bill that would prohibit the use of drones by state or local law enforcement in Virginia until 2014 or 2015. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
Anderson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:24 am
Pa. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
4) Judicial activism v. judicial restraint. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Yesterday, the cybersecurity bill failed to obtain the required amount of votes required to move the legislation forward. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm
Finally, the Bill states that any language in a first-party insurance policy that conflicts with the Bill’s language is void as against public Policy. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court suggests why that is a mistake on North Carolina’s part.In Berger v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:34 am
She brings this suit along with Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT) against the state because of its alleged ambiguous language in Senate Bill 474 (SB 474), also known as the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am
State by state survey of 140 bills around the country on hot topics related to religious accommodation, including adoption, service refusals, campus speech, health care, etc. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:04 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 9:49 am
Henry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
In a 2013 decision, State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 12:45 pm
It is fairly common for sweeping employment law legislation to be introduced in the California legislature and I usually do not pay much attention to these bills because they usually do not become law.One of two things almost always happens: (1) the republicans introduce a pro-employer bill that will never pass the democratically-controlled legislature or (2) the democrats introduce a pro-employee bill that passes but is then vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.However, I… [read post]
