Search for: "State v. Frame"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 6,711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 12:59 pm
In today’s case (Middleton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
I’m aware of only a dozen or so federal courts that have local rules either stating that the defense doesn’t need to make a formal discovery motion, or requiring the government to disclose Brady/Giglio material within a specific time frame, without mentioning a defense motion. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:51 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 1:09 am
The comments are in, and the court has handed in a second decision (BASCA v Secretary of State [2015] EWHC 2041) that will frame the final order. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
To be sure, Obamacare subsidies in federal-exchange states were taking place before the Court affirmed their validity in King v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm
” In the time frames specified (starting on Adoption Day and continuing for various periods of between 8 year and 25 years), Iran will allow the IAEA to both monitor the implementation of the voluntary measures and to implement transparency measures that include: a long-term IAEA presence in Iran; IAEA monitoring of uranium ore concentrate; containment and surveillance of centrifuge rotors and bellows; and a reliable mechanism to ensure speedy resolution of IAEA access… [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:41 am
In Oliphant v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Sibron v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:05 am
The Supreme Court uses an inmate suicide case to remind us how hard it is to hold individual government defendants liable in constitutional cases whey they can assert qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields them from litigation when the state of the law is not clearly-established at the time of the violation.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:26 am
Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C., v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
Perry, Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
Kemp as a frame on which to hang the history of the death penalty in this country - and of efforts to abolish it. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Yukon Francophone School Board, Education Area #23 v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:04 pm
An interesting decision, and I think a correct one, handed down Tuesday by a Texas Court of Appeals panel in Long v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:57 am
The district court in this case defined the clearly established right similarly and therefore correctly stated “the level of generality at which the relevant ‘legal rule’ is to be identified. [read post]
