Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 7,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2014, 10:08 am
SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT Higgins v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
Garden & Pet Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
Tatel, a liberal, and two conservatives, Senior Judge Silberman and Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown.) [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
Among other cases, the Supreme Courtandrsquo;s majority opinion cited the 1987 case Shearson/American Express Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Sebelius (opinion downloads as a pdf), ruling the Affordable Health Care Act constitutional, or the 2013 cases, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:53 am
United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:11 am
The plaintiffs in the King v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:12 am
In ALI SALEH KAHLAH AL-MARRI v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm
In Wittman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm
In Wittman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm
In Wittman v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 11:54 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 7:49 pm
In McSparron v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
For his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen suggests that Paul Clement wrote the brief for North Carolina “as if there were still a five Justice conservative majority on the Court,” despite foreseeing a defeat by this approach, so that Clement and the state “could paint the loss as caused by the ‘liberal Justices. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 1:09 pm
As part of the liberal quartet of the Supreme Court he had helped establish habeas corpus for terrorists captured overseas in 2006 and wrote a masterpiece of dissent in the recent Citizens United v F.E.C. - a case concerning corporate free speech in the tune of campaign dollars to candidates. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
FBL) in UT SW v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:20 am
When Eastern District of New York Judge John Gleeson used his sentencing memo in U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
* Apple has clarified and liberalized its App Store policies. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:43 pm
Moreover, this was hardly an “apolitical” decision, because it forced states to reduce representation for (conservative) rural areas in favor of (liberal) urban areas, consistent with the political interests of the Court’s majority. [read post]
