Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 6,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
To the extent that the state court based its conclusion on the IQ score of 75, the Court cited Hall v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
The Court’s opinion squarely puts the Patent Act in the latter category. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:57 am
The Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:18 pm
A proposal for a 2,200 cell facility in Kingston would cost $500 million to build and cover 1.6 million square feet, with 650 prison guards. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:50 am
In Reed v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:02 am
They owned a 50-acrew ranch, a 3,100 square-foot home, with property valued at $1.85 million. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:39 am
He sued the city in state court, but the matter was removed to federal court. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 am
United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
B.A.S. v S.R.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:47 am
Spann v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm
” State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed, with the… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed, with the… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:58 pm
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
Failure to follow this axiom left the tenant in Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The Commission's resolution was approved by the State Civil Service Commission in February 2011. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The Commission's resolution was approved by the State Civil Service Commission in February 2011. [read post]
