Search for: "U. S. v. Mays"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 7,529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
During Jones’s stay in the Third Circuit, the Court held in Welch v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
It asserted that PCH days are intended to provide employees the opportunity to observe holidays and other meaningful dates that may not be observed generally at the employee’s worksite. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
’Rutgerson's case proceeded to a jury trial on August 25, 2014.U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Let’s look at each briefly, and then his defenses.Schneiderman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 1:13 pm
Fry v Napoleon Community Schs No. 15-497. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The summarized cases are for April and May 2016. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The summarized cases are for April and May 2016. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:23 pm
It is not enough for the Government to argue that the encrypted drives are capable of storing vast amounts of data, some of which may be incriminating. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 11:56 am
Pittman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:22 am
Section 3-3 prohibits “[u]sing verbally abusive language to or in front of students” and Section 3-17 prohibits “[v]iolating School rules, Board rules, policies or procedures that result in behaviors that disrupt the orderly educational process in the classroom, in the school, and may occur on or off the school grounds or assigned work location. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:22 am
In Federman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:22 am
In Federman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 12:30 am
Ende Mai 2016 veröffentlichte die GPK den entsprechenden Bericht (PDF). [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:33 pm
In the case, Pittman v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
In Foster v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
In Foster v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:31 am
Roberts read a decision, from United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:53 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 8:01 am
Il est conçu pour les besoins de ce colloque dans une acception très large : il ne s’identifie en effet ni au seul précédent jurisprudentiel, ni à la pratique à proprement parler mais vise à englober tout comportement passé – en opposition précisément à l’ensemble des comportements formant une pratique – susceptible de produire des effets de droit. [read post]
