Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 3421 - 3440 of 8,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
YudellCase number: 15-cv-04548 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: June 11, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 16, 2015 7/31/2015 10/29/2015 2015-74 SEC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:15 am by Richard S. Zackin
Caterpillar, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld a forum selection clause requiring a participant in a benefits plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) to bring suit in the Central District of Illinois. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:31 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeLoss Amount Counsel Ineffectiveness Claim Remanded to Develop Record, Adjudication United States, appellee, v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
App. 3d. 755, 758 (pdf) (biopsy allowed); Sullivan, Long & Haggerty, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
Here's the abstract: In the wake of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 11:58 am by Christopher G. Hill
The Western District of Virginia federal court restated this fact in a recent opinion, South End Constructors Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
The first week, they will review Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark Int’l, Inc., which also presents a momentous transactional question: When a firm holding a patent sells a product to which the patent applies, does the sale necessarily “exhaust” its rights to enforce the patent as to that product? [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 6:56 pm
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Mondelēz International, Inc. manufactures and distributes those products by its various family members.Ominously for Retrobrands’ petition, the Board started its discussion by stating that, “CHICLETS branded gum has been sold in the United States continuously by various predecessors-in-interest since around 1900. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In MetalCraft, Judge Moore wrote an opinion denying the appeal of Toroconcerning a preliminary injunction:The United States District Court for the EasternDistrict of Wisconsin granted Metalcraft of Mayville,Inc. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:22 pm by Larry
United States and Victoria's Secret Direct v. [read post]