Search for: "United States v. James" Results 3421 - 3440 of 4,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am by Adam Klasfeld
Instead, Smith leveled four charges that focused more narrowly on Trump’s multi-state false electors scheme and the pressure campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to count those fraudulent electoral votes: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstructing an official proceeding, and violating a Reconstruction-era civil rights law, drafted originally to protect formerly enslaved people through criminal sanction. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
A discussion of the R.P. and others v United Kingdom case (see above). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Cooter and Siegel, for example, believe that a Resolution VI-based reading of Article I, Section 8 support revisiting the analysis in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
United States, a wiretapping case. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Jane Bambauer
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Unlimited liability was never the norm for bank shareholders or executives in the United States. [read post]