Search for: "Brown v. Wells" Results 3441 - 3460 of 4,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
Kluger, Simple Justice:  The History of Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:40 pm by autumn
 It has happened to countless others as well, more than a just society is prepared to admit. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Mark Merenda
It is telling that the bits I liked best were actual Shakespeare: like the on-stage performance of Henry V, in which the audience is so stirred by Henry’s St. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Mark Merenda
It is telling that the bits I liked best were actual Shakespeare: like the on-stage performance of Henry V, in which the audience is so stirred by Henry’s St. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Michael McConnell has made a prominent originalist argument defending Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Indeed, because other students were injured as well, arguably all of their compensation is limited to $500,000, but as far as I know she’s the only one who sued. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
On 23 November 2011, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Sugar v BBC [2010] EWCA Civ 715, a long-standing and well-publicised dispute stemming from a freedom of information request made of the BBC in January 2005. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm by JB
Steve Calabresi and Julia Rickert's new article, Originalism and Sex Discrimination, attempts to do for the 1970s sex equality decisions what Michael McConnell's 1995 article, "Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions," did for Brown v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
” Professor Black’smagisterial essay on the Supreme Court’s 1954-1955 decisions in Brown v. [read post]