Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 8,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In Davis v Siben & Siben, LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 06906 Decided on December 7, 2022 the Appellate Division, Second Department placed great weight on the day that the law firm served an order permitting withdrawal with notice of entry on Plaintiff. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Davis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v Environcom Ltd… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:18 am
Supreme Court made getting such an injunction in a patent case extremely difficult with its landmark eBay v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
“The twin purposes of the doctrine are to protect the integrity of the judicial process and to protect judicial integrity by avoiding the risk of inconsistent results in two proceedings'” (Davis v Citibank, N.A. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
More recently, in Freytag v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
The key case here is the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in the companion cases of Davis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
Missouri has the power to withhold state assistance, “but the means it uses to achieve its ends must be [, as the Court observed in McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
Alexander v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
More from Overlawyered and Wendy Davis. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 5:29 am
Davis, 2010 Ohio 5704, 2010 Ohio App. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:23 am
Norwood v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
In Neely v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Affirmed.Case Name: CHRISTOPHER HARIGNORDOQUY v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:26 am
CARBAUGH v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:49 pm
Backpage.com separately filed suit against this law, represented by the law firm of Davis Wright Tremaine, who also joined today's argument. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 6:40 am
But you said nothing when Trump did similar. https://t.co/Ggv2IZH0w3— V Daniels (@funkapunk) October 22, 2022 Here's a 2021 column in The Guardian: "From Aristotle to Einstein: a brief history of power nappers/Churchill took naps for at least an hour, Da Vinci for 20 minutes and Dalí for just a second" by Caroline Davies. [read post]
