Search for: "Davis v. State"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 6,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
Randy Smith, and Stephen Reinhardt -- the last of the 3 having denied the motion to disqualify himself filed by proponents of the ban, contained in the state's Constitution as a result of voters' approval of a 2008 ballot initiative, Proposition 8 (prior IntLawGrrls posts available here).The Ninth Circuit has decided to permit live dissemination of the arguments in the case, Perry v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
This Essay expands the analysis in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 9:49 am
This is McCleskey v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
” On 8 to 10 November 2021, Saini J heard the trial in the harassment and libel case of Davies v Carter, judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 15 November 2021. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
This morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Merit Management Group v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:22 am
Davis and Bryan A. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:10 pm
Davis, 128 Md. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:14 am
And in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
This has been the law in Michigan since Davis v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:31 pm
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), Davis v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
The final Rule uses a definition of discriminatory "sexual harassment" that closely tracks this Court's definition of that term in Davis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Ohio law); Carr-Davis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 2:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
June 30, 2004); Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[x] See also, Davis v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Parke Davis & Co., 705 P.2d 1001, 1003 (Colo. [read post]
