Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
(Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Carl v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
” The bill provides for no due process before such summary expulsion, and it does not provide any limit based on length of time a person has resided in the United States or proximity to the border. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Over the last few years, I have puzzled over the refusal of some people to refer to trans men as men and trans women as women. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Like Mallory, disgruntled current or former employees, plan members, or other opposing parties in disputes may choose to file their lawsuit in the state with the laws, rules, or precedent most favorable to their position even where the dispute does not arise out of events occurring in the chosen state. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
The Bill of Rights was designed to be (and has proven to be) extraordinarily difficult to amend, further evidencing that the Founders were convinced that government does not belong in all aspects of its citizens’ lives. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:30 am
V. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Moreover, the term “shall” at the beginning of the first sentence reflects that the obligation is binding on Canada and does not give space for discretionary application of the rule. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
In Alaska’s Senate race, another close contest, voting does not end in some Aleutian Islands until 1 AM EST. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
The lawsuit does not involve provisional ballots, signature matches or counting delays—logistical aspects of modern elections that are increasingly subject to legal dispute—but instead attacks the basic substantive rules that Maine law uses to determine who wins Congressional elections.The crux of the legal challenge is the permissibility of Maine’s Ranked-Choice Voting system, which the state’s voters adopted via a citizen initiative in 2016 and reaffirmed as to… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Keith Alexander replied, “On those, you’re starting to get closer to what would be [considered war]” (Harris, 2009, brackets in original). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
In Su v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:03 pm
” This definition does not rely on any particular Senate procedure and would require judicial “explor[ation] [of] communications between the Senate Minority and the president. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
So this cautionary possibility does not hold them back either. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
By Eric Goldman [This post is composed of three parts. [read post]
