Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS" Results 3441 - 3460 of 6,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2013, 8:30 am by Joy Waltemath
., and its subsidiary, CNH America LLC (collectively CNH), in what appeared to be an effort to solicit plaintiffs to commence a class action against CNH. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Broc Romanek
Volgenau and other stockholders was equal, and plaintiffs had not succeeded in creating a triable issue of fact to the contrary. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:24 am by Kevin LaCroix
  A shareholder of Symantec had filed a putative class action on behalf of Symantec shareholders alleging that the compensation-related disclosures in the company’s proxy statement were inadequate to permit the shareholders to cast their advisory “say on pay” vote at the company’s 2012 shareholders’ meeting. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Plaintiff Save the Plastic Bag Coalition (the “Coalition”) sued claiming CEQA required an EIR for such an ordinance, but the trial court denied its writ petition. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:18 am by Anubha Sinha
Further, the plaintiff had no evidence to establish violation of its copyright by leading any independent evidence of any actual confusion in the mind of any user or customer. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Merrill Lynch & Co., 672 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 2012), perhaps the leading post-Wal-Mart ruling certifying an employment discrimination disparate impact class claim for injunctive relief under Rule 23 (c)(4). [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Merrill Lynch & Co., 672 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 2012), perhaps the leading post-Wal-Mart ruling certifying an employment discrimination disparate impact class claim for injunctive relief under Rule 23 (c)(4). [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Ford cited no authority holding that similarly situated plaintiffs may not piggyback on a lead plaintiff’s retaliation claim, and the court declined to create such a rule. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:15 am
The plaintiff acknowledged being part of the class, and by accepting the terms of the settlement agreement, the court held, the plaintiff had released the bank from any further claims related to ATM fees. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:06 am by Andrew Trask
In other words, when the plaintiff is seeking an injunction or declaratory relief, it is OK if some of the class members disagree with the relief she seeks, or whether there is a problem in the first place. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Merrill Lynch & Co., 672 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 2012), perhaps the leading post-Wal-Mart ruling certifying an employment discrimination disparate impact class claim for injunctive relief under Rule 23 (c)(4). [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 11:58 am by Lauren Willis
Certainly access to attorneys ought to be more broadly available so that the merit of the claim rather than the wealth of the plaintiff would determine who gets a lawyer. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
The incidence is also higher when the lead plaintiff is an institutional investor and when the lawsuit is files under Section 11. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:52 am by Jon Hyman
This employer, however, was relying on actual time-stamped examples from the lead plaintiff’s Facebook profile [pdf]. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   Judge Gee found that the parties’ submissions and even from SAG’s own presentation in the insurance coverage dispute lead to “but one result,” which is that because SAG was “obligated to account for and distribute the foreign levy funds to the plaintiff class,” SAG “failed to establish that the $330,000 fee award arises from a ‘covered’ Claim under the Policy. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am by Andrew Frisch
Also, the formation of such entities did not lead any of the nurses to use them as a vehicle to offer their services as entrepreneurs to other health care providers or to the public in general. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:27 pm by Mack Sperling
The lead claim against the YMCA was that it engaged in an unfair and deceptive practice, in violation of G.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:57 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
In the suit (Complaint accessible here), the class plaintiffs (current and former employees of Aaron’s) claim they were not paid for their 30-minute meal periods. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
In addition, the revised Japanese securities laws “may lead to more favorable outcomes for plaintiffs than they could realize under U.S. securities laws,” owing to the significantly reduced burden of proof for plaintiffs and to the “no-fault liability on the part of corporations for their misstatements. [read post]