Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 3441 - 3460 of 39,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2022, 1:41 am by Eleonora Rosati
In a judgment handed down yesterday - Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379 (IPEC) - the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) answered 'yes' and applied guidance derived from EU law, including the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Cofemel (Katposts here).Let's see what happened.BackgroundOnly Fools and Horses (OFAH) is a successful BBC TV series that ran between 1981 and 1991, with also some Christmas… [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am by Philip Mousavizadeh
The expansion of sanctions is likely to force U.S. investors to sell Russia-linked debts or write them off as having little to no value. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
So they sued, and at a bench trial, recovered compensatory damages that totaled a little over $800,000.Not surprisingly, given the nature of the torts, there were also punitive damages imposed. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Winchester v Little, 996 SW2d 818, 827 [Sup Ct, Tenn 1999].) [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm by Richard Hunt
It would have been helpful if the Court had told us a little more about the difference between the allegations in Calcano and the allegations in Kreisler. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Explaining why the outcome likely differs from the 2020 UK judgment against The Sun over similar allegations, Persephone Bridgman Baker, a partner at Carter-Ruck, points to the use of “more evidence in the US proceedings about Heard’s credibility, on which the judge in the UK placed little importance. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 10:43 am by James Kwong
 Use in an online environmentThe court first set out a recap on case law illustrating what constitutes “use” in an online environment, including the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Google France [2010] RPC 19, L’Oréal v eBay [2011] RPC 27, and Coty Germany v Amazon Services Europe [2020] ETMR 27.Samsung contended that it did not use the signs at all. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:45 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Radzik and Agrella, 955 NE 2d 591 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2011 Both parties will be incentivized to pay their attorneys as little as possible before an interim fee hearing in order to make minimize the effects of leveling the playing field. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:23 pm by Kevin
This of course would make sense because this is, after all, a definition of “fish,” which definitely live in water all the time (except when they are jumping unless they are lungfish, which walk or at least creep a little). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
But the angriest and most upset I ever heard him was about an old concurring opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia in Herrera v. [read post]