Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3441 - 3460
of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
No. 3122052) filed on February 24, 2005 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and stated to have been first used in commerce at least as early as February 4, 2004 (the "FACEBOOK Marks"), and a European Community Trademark for FACEBOOK (Reg. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:52 am
Schlafly v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:27 am
Intellogy Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
That latter section does not expressly state that the opposition period cannot be extended after the fact. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:12 am
Marathon Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:39 am
CFA Institute v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:56 pm
Seeking further guidance, we turn to the Federal Circuit, wherein the issue was addressed in Swatch AG v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:14 am
State-based registrations offer some of the protections of federal registration, and are a useful tool to stake one’s claim in a trademark within the states that the mark is used, and provide notice to competitors of that claim. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am
Crane, Cato Regulation magazine] “Solicitor General Inveighs Against Antitrust-Law Revolution in SCOTUS ‘Apple v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:47 am
United States v. [read post]
Michigan Supreme Court States New Process to Determine “proximate cause” under GTLA - Is it Clearer?
24 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
Mark T. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:43 pm
This marks the first Second Amendment case considered by the United States Supreme Court since 1939. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:17 am
Yesterday, May 18th, the United States Supreme Court issued Ashcroft, Former Attorney General v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
Dfinity Found. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:12 am
In the case at hand, the Claimants had issued a claim for (a) trade mark infringement and (b) inducing a breach of contract. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
This contract stated that the bag business sold by Baquet included the Benelux word mark NATHAN, which he had had registered in 1991 for leather items, clothing and shoes in Classes 18 and 25. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm
”Id. at 454–55 (citation , alterations, andinternal quotation marks omitted).See also Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
