Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3441 - 3460
of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am
Since the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
As Civil Procedure professors, we were intrigued by the Court’s disposition of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
However, it has been identified as a defence in the CJEU case of Budĕjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (C-482/09).Hacon HHJ drew on the summary of honest concurrent use from Victoria Plum Ltd v Victorian Plumbing [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch) (see IPKat analysis here), which established that it would be possible for two separate entities to co-exist, such that the inevitable confusion that arises has to be… [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
The EBA’s decision states that the two approaches give the same result and referred to various national cases. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:09 am
’ Rule 702(b). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:40 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 11:40 am
They do not, however, frequently play out like Rebecca Stampe's plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
Unlike Section 6015(b) and (c), Section 6015(f) does not contain any time limitation by which a taxpayer must claim this type of relief. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
Common Sense Press Inc. d/b/a Pocket Jacks Comics v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
B. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:03 pm
Dunn v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:24 am
%#@ Well, in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:19 am
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:29 pm
According to the court, the Board’s decision not to consider the defense was contrary to the Board’s precedent, which had stated that “[a] union can relinquish its statutory right to information. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
In Kaufman it was noted that 8 NYCRR former 30.9 (b) (now 8 NYCRR 30-1.9 [c]) "protects teachers from being deprived of credit in a previously appointed tenure area if they unwittingly accept, and serve in, out-of-area assignments. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am
(b) Can a lack of a licence request be inferred from licence terms presented by the SEP user by way of a counter-offer, with the result that the action for a prohibitory injunction brought by the SEP holder is subsequently allowed without first assessing whether the SEP holder’s own licence offer (which preceded the SEP user’s counter-offer) complies with FRAND terms in the first place? [read post]
