Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 36,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm
Partially tribal land: The case for limiting state eminent domain power under 25 USC 357. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:11 am
The CAT Rules set the time limit for bringing a claim; specifically, rule 31 states that a s 47A claim must be brought “within a period of two years beginning with the relevant date“. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
" To take only one example: Marshall's holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
As stated by the Tennessee Supreme Courtin Press v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Gutierrez 13-347Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b)… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:51 pm
Supreme Court mavens focused their attention on several new opinions the Court issued in key cases–including the major climate change decision (in American Electric Power v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
Brooks (11-898), Agarano v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
In Turnell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
In Turnell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 3:50 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:00 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am
The Supreme Court held in that case that the power under section 1(1), although stated in broad terms, was subject to some limitation. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:58 am
In Ozanne v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 8:35 am
The Second Circuit recently upheld a ruling stating that the OCC is the exclusive enforcer of banking laws for national banks in Clearing House Association, LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See Bassett v. [read post]
